Skip to main content

Posts

Supervised vs Non Supervised Visitation

Beware having to be placed on supervised visitation; it is very expensive, it's difficult to get into an agency, and even if you get into the agency, it's still fairly expensive. Having a third party which or who is not an agency supervisor is a good alternative. Preferably not someone who hates you? Attorney is seeing many cases where everyone thinks the parent should be supervised. Unfortunately, what usually happens is that it becomes a show and tell episode of fault finding. Attorney has seen this pattern relentlessly.  The goal of supervised visits is to improve the parent, not make him/her worse.  While no one is perfect, observation in public places of one who is watching their own kid will be skewed by each party because they are critical of each other to begin with. That is why a supervisor who is objective, not subjective, will not necessarily try and take sides. In all fairness we would like kids to have good parents with some skills. Many parents lack th...

SAVE $1,325+ on Your Case

ATTORNEY IS IN THE BUSINESS OF SOLVING PROBLEMS.  You have come to the right attorney for your problem here...                Even if you are losing your case---attorney can likely turn it around.                               Attorney limits how many cases she works on at a time, and                  actually excels at  difficult cases..                  Attorney often works on cases that other attorneys won't work on.                                                        Affordable service * Friendly Help  *                          ...

Truth about Mediation and Settling Cases Without Counsel

It should be known that "mediation" only means settling cases, and the mediation person is not usually advocating for your side, he/she is just there to settle the case. Now that doesn't mean he/she may not explain the law, but seriously, how can just explaining the law point out each person's rights without an opinion on what is right? Clients usually don't know the law or their entitlement rights, that's why they hire attorneys; but hiring mediators that just settle cases doesn't mean necessarily that YOUR rights will be necessarily covered. Why? Well if a mediator doesn't tell you your rights then what rights do you have?  If a mediator can only point out things, because they do not actually  advocate for one side, you can hire your own advocate who will ONLY take your side for whatever position you have, explain the details, and explain (to you only) --- why or why not you might or might win a specific point? The adversary system is normally...

They Don't Call Attorney the Pitbull Litigator for Nothing?

Pitbull litigator and Litigation in Animal Law Cases One of the first cases in federal law involving a pitbull in Northern California, was when the police killed the owner's pitbull..... Summary:  Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Primary Citation:    36 F3d 65 (9th Cir. 1994) Motion for leave to amend § 1983 civil rights complaint to add claims that police officer violated Fourth Amendment by shooting pet dog and by pointing gun at one plaintiff was denied and the United States District Court for the Northern District of California entered summary judgment in favor of police officers and city. Plaintiffs appealed. The Court of Appeals held that: (1) killing of pet dog stated Fourth Amendment violation, but (2) no seizure of plaintiff occurred when police pointed gun. Case below (non pitbull dog we assume) re 42 USC 1983 claim: Moreno v. Hughes 2016 WL 212932 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 19, 2016) This § 1983 action arises from the shooting of Plaintiffs' do...