Skip to main content

Supervised vs Non Supervised Visitation

Beware having to be placed on supervised visitation; it is very expensive, it's difficult to get into an agency, and even if you get into the agency, it's still fairly expensive.

Having a third party which or who is not an agency supervisor is a good alternative. Preferably not someone who hates you?

Attorney is seeing many cases where everyone thinks the parent should be supervised. Unfortunately, what usually happens is that it becomes a show and tell episode of fault finding. Attorney has seen this pattern relentlessly.  The goal of supervised visits is to improve the parent, not make him/her worse.  While no one is perfect, observation in public places of one who is watching their own kid will be skewed by each party because they are critical of each other to begin with.

That is why a supervisor who is objective, not subjective, will not necessarily try and take sides.
In all fairness we would like kids to have good parents with some skills. Many parents lack these
skills and will need to complete parenting classes.  Some parents never learn--and that is not uncommon.  Some parents do improve. Some just continue to fight as to how to raise the kids.

Attorney knows that people can change, but it basically should be done willingly. Unwillingly
usually causes more problems in long run. After having observed many cases with kids, attorney
realizes that if the kids are resilient, and most are, they can do better down the road when they get
older. If they have already sustained too much emotional garbage they can still change but will have
to work on it. Repeated patterns in psychology tend to indicate there are a ton of things that can be
improved, but they take time.

Popular posts from this blog

You Don't Have Rights if You Don't Know What They Are?

Not surprisingly, many clients believe what their friends tell them and what they see on TV and Facebook.  Unfortunately, it's best to actually know at least some of the law that governs the type of issue you have. If you had a complicated separate property issue, compounded by numerous transactions that may or may not create further problems, you would likely have no idea how those issues would be handled. Or if you have side businesses which add to your employment income, and you don't want to pay high spousal, well-- you're going to need a plan well in advance!  Unfortunately, a client may just want to agree to shared visitation where one spouse never pays anything but the other spouse then has to pay increased support because there is not any child support offset?  A typical client isn't going to know these things. Or, if you had a part time business that you owned years before you met your spouse, and then he started siphoning money out of the business wit...

Good Advice--Family, Criminal or Civil Case

I read and laughed at another attorney's post on a criminal law blog; Essentially he's telling people to shut up and don't be posting online about their cases. He's pretty funny actually, great sense of humor. In Family Law, we don't see this specific issue as much as compared to Criminal law cases. But this attorney is correct. In Family Law, it's even worse, because the Jerry Springer quality in people divorcing comes out, and that JS quality can ruin your case.  I won't say exactly why or how but common sense is common sense.  I found this data directly below, kind of interesting........ Here is what the OTHER attorney (in Philadelphia area) said----- what he says below is exactly correct.   https://phillylawblog.wordpress.com/tag/shut-up/   Free Legal Advice of the Day — STOP TALKING ON AVVO. Today’s legal pro-tip: If you are a criminal defendant, or a potential criminal defendant — SHUT UP. Don’t talk on the internet, even if you get “fre...

Why Pay to "Settle" Cases When You can Win??

Remarkably, some attorneys are in the business of charging fees to "settle" cases when you could have done that yourself....often they call this "mediation" of cases, and we don't mean mediation as to child custody.  We mean mediation-- of  all issues. PITFALLS OF MEDIATION.....Y OU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL AND YOU  DON'T KNOW YOUR RIGHTS !! This attorney's past experience with such cases usually means that one client forces the other to cave in, while the client who caves in doesn't even realize that he or she caved in when it was not necessary.  OR-- one party knowingly concedes a major issue, without realizing just how major the issue is (because he/she has no attorney representing him/her) -- and then loses his/her ass, because he/she thought they were "saving money" when that was not the case. For example, attorney has seen this done where one client who was earning $85k a year gross, vs the other party was earning ...