Skip to main content

Is Trial Required in Your Case?

Most cases in Family Law may not require a trial or long cause hearing or hearings, BUT if a hearing requires taking testimony, then normally that hearing goes on the long cause calendar. This can get expensive due to the time and evidence preparation and the planned cross examination, depending on how many witnesses are needed.  To avoid the time and expense, if you have no big issues that you can't solve then you may not need a long cause hearing at all.

Unfortunately, some cases will require such a hearing or trial. Although this can become rather costly, it some cases it will be worth it, especially if you are owed money, property, or the kids were wrongly taken from you; if false (provably false) allegations were used to gain money/property/custody, then you may not have much choice in order to change the status.
Family law has some very specific time limits on how long you can wait before the statute might run on certain issues-- many of these Codes, especially Family Code Sections  2105, 2106, 2107, 2120, 2121, 2122, 2123, 2125. And FC 2640 which relates to separate property reimbursements is a real nightmare if the "judge" who is not a judge (but is commissioner) doesn't understand how it works?  Be very, very careful if you have this issue because quite frankly, with underwater property, the wrong ruling can cause one spouse to lose all cash put down on a property PLUS loss of the property itself.

We say this only because we have seen it happen.  It is likely only a writ or an appeal might salvage the bad ruling. The appeal might be won but unless some type of stay is in place, there would still be a problem.  And of course, that can be extremely costly.  http://codes.findlaw.com/ca/family-code/

Popular posts from this blog

Chico Butte County Local Attorney Family Law Divorce Affordable

Chico Family Lawyers - Compare Top Family Attorneys in Chico ... https://www.justia.com/lawyers/family-law/california/chico Chico, California Family Lawyers. LOCAL ATTORNEY  Carolyn J. Chan. Chico, CA Family Law Attorney  with 20+ years experience. From Family Law Attorney Chico C. Chan "Affordable services, great reviews+references, 98.5% win rate, friendly down to earth service with a smile--no guts, no glory!" Family Law Attorney in Chico  C. Chan, Esq. Can't Let Go of the Past? It happens....we focus on what went wrong during marriage, but don't focus… 5 days ago Family Law Attorney Chico C. Chan Website Directions Butte County Family Lawyers - Compare Top Family Attorneys in Butte ...

Why Pay to "Settle" Cases When You can Win??

Remarkably, some attorneys are in the business of charging fees to "settle" cases when you could have done that yourself....often they call this "mediation" of cases, and we don't mean mediation as to child custody.  We mean mediation-- of  all issues. PITFALLS OF MEDIATION.....Y OU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL AND YOU  DON'T KNOW YOUR RIGHTS !! This attorney's past experience with such cases usually means that one client forces the other to cave in, while the client who caves in doesn't even realize that he or she caved in when it was not necessary.  OR-- one party knowingly concedes a major issue, without realizing just how major the issue is (because he/she has no attorney representing him/her) -- and then loses his/her ass, because he/she thought they were "saving money" when that was not the case. For example, attorney has seen this done where one client who was earning $85k a year gross, vs the other party was earning

DO YOU NEED TEMPORARY SUPPORT? YES!!!!

It is possible.......that a client may fail to request temporary            spousal support "unknowingly"......  and in so doing, because an "agreement" or stipulation was entered as to permanent support , and there was no motion to the court asking for temporary support-- there was no date to which a trial court could make the permanent support order retroactive in accordance with Family Code Section 4333. Family Code section 4333 controls the permissible date on which a permanent spousal support order may begin. In contrast, an order for temporary spousal may, at the court's discretion, be made retroactive to the date on which the petition for dissolution was filed, or in some cases, on the date that the request for order was filed.   [Under FC4009, an original order for child support may generally be made retroactive to the date of filing the petition, complaint, or other initial pleading] Basically, without a filed separate request for temporary