Chico Family Law Attorney C. Chan 530.497-0777... Win Your Case!

Beware having to be placed on supervised visitation; it is very expensive, it's difficult to get into an agency, and even if you get into the agency, it's still fairly expensive. Having a third party which or who is not an agency supervisor is a good alternative. Preferably not someone who hates you? Attorney is seeing many cases where everyone thinks the parent should be supervised. Unfortunately, what usually happens is that it becomes a show and tell episode of fault finding. Attorney has seen this pattern relentlessly.  The goal of supervised visits is to improve the parent, not make him/her worse.  While no one is perfect, observation in public places of one who is watching their own kid will be skewed by each party because they are critical of each other to begin with. That is why a supervisor who is objective, not subjective, will not necessarily try and take sides. In all fairness we would like kids to have good parents with some skills. Many parents lack the

ATTORNEY IS IN THE BUSINESS OF SOLVING PROBLEMS.  You have come to the right attorney for your problem here...                Even if you are losing your case---attorney can likely turn it around.                               Attorney limits how many cases she works on at a time, and                  actually excels at  difficult cases..                  Attorney often works on cases that other attorneys won't work on.                                                        Affordable service * Friendly Help  *                                                Great Problem Solving* Winning Strategy        If you have a job and somewhat decent credit, or  your former spouse does  or  you are still married and no dissolution has been filed,  then you should call attorney.  We have worked for more than 20 years with clients   that  can  afford legal help--  they just  can't  afford to pay $250/hr. Attorney herein is a down to earth,

It should be known that "mediation" only means settling cases, and the mediation person is not usually advocating for your side, he/she is just there to settle the case. Now that doesn't mean he/she may not explain the law, but seriously, how can just explaining the law point out each person's rights without an opinion on what is right? Clients usually don't know the law or their entitlement rights, that's why they hire attorneys; but hiring mediators that just settle cases doesn't mean necessarily that YOUR rights will be necessarily covered. Why? Well if a mediator doesn't tell you your rights then what rights do you have?  If a mediator can only point out things, because they do not actually  advocate for one side, you can hire your own advocate who will ONLY take your side for whatever position you have, explain the details, and explain (to you only) --- why or why not you might or might win a specific point? The adversary system is normally